![]() ![]() Your support is needed now to show the world that controlled demolition has not been debunked. So please give before June 10 to make the ultimate, real debunking film. Your support is urgently needed to counter the media’s disinformation and inform countless millions of people who are ready for the truth. Plus, if you donate $35 or more before June 10, we’ll mail you a DVD of the film as soon as it’s released so you can share it and help raise awareness. You will help create a cutting-edge documentary for social media - one that’s truly geared to the masses, who are increasingly skeptical and want to know the truth about 9/11.įeaturing engineers Jon Cole and Tony Szamboti and directed by Dylan Avery, this film will cut through the noise and explain in a simple, entertaining way how the media has distorted the evidence of controlled demolition. That’s the date $50,000 must be raised to make this film. Please make your most generous gift before June 10. Will you donate now to counteract the media’s baseless propaganda? Demolition Physics The basics of controlled demolition physics are shown in. I need your help to fight back with a film that definitively refutes this lie. You can see many videos of controlled demolitions on the Internet (see. The issue has caught a second wind after US President Obama approved the publication of the 28-page inquiry on the matter.I’m writing today to ask for your help with a very important film that must get produced before this year’s 9/11 anniversary.įor far too long - and especially last September, when Spike Lee was forced to cut 9/11 Truth from his HBO series - the media has gotten away with spreading the lie that controlled demolition has been “debunked.” ![]() "What is more important is that independent researchers may read the article and provide their own arguments to refute the claims," Velasco and Hermans told Sputnik.įifteen years ago the 9/11 terrorist attack sparked a heated debate, prompting numerous speculations and theories. Remarkably, Germany's reputable weekly news magazine Stern paid attention to the article. However, it seems that American media sources remained largely silent. When asked about the comments on the study, the editors noted that some media reports have touched upon the issue. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors." However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. "This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, Velasco and Hermans remarked that since the study contains some speculations and controversial conclusions they attached the disclaimer which says: The scientists clarified that the authors of the article were recommended to them by the magazine's editorial board. Then an open discussion with due arguments would lead us to truth," Velasco and Hermans emphasized. However, given the fact that the issue is considered controversial by specialists more competent in this area than we are, we believe that the best - and really scientifically correct - way to resolve such matters is to publish these opinions. Our personal opinion on the theory is that it is highly unlikely that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition. "We hope that the discussion triggered by this article will help to shed some light on these matters in scientific terms. scientific forensic evidence points to explosive controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11. However, they highlighted, there appear to be gaps in the US' argument. These simulations and experiments have brought different results," the scientists told Sputnik.Īnswering the question on the consistency of the US' official position on the 9/11 tragedy the scientists noted that although they cannot speak for the authors of the study they have no reasons to throw into question Washington's official stance. Several groups of scientists, including those from Purdue University, have carried out a number of rigorous simulations of tower destructions and conducted endurance tests on steel girders exposing them to kerosene fire. "According to some physicists, in three cases it remained unclear why the steel-framed high-rise buildings collapsed from exposure to high temperatures in a way it occurred. Velasco and Jo Hermans shared their views on the controversial issue. ![]() Methods vary accounting to the type of building that is being demolished. However, there’s more to demolition than swinging a wrecking ball it involves highly trained experts working with debris, weather conditions, materials, mass, and physics. In an interview with Sputnik Deutschland Europhysics News' editors and scientists Victor R. Demolition is the process of dismantling a building by pre-planned or controlled methods. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |